Outcome, survival, and costs in patients undergoing intubation for carcinoma of the esophagus
In this prospective study a consec utive series of 70 patients undergoing insertion of a Wilson-Cook endoprosthesis for palliation of esophageal carcinoma was examined. The tube was inserted endoscopically using intravenous sedation and a pulsion technique. The patients had a mean (SEM) age of 70.7...
Saved in:
Published in | The American journal of surgery Vol. 174; no. 3; pp. 316 - 319 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01.09.1997
Elsevier Elsevier Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In this prospective study a consec utive series of 70 patients undergoing insertion of a Wilson-Cook endoprosthesis for palliation of esophageal carcinoma was examined.
The tube was inserted endoscopically using intravenous sedation and a pulsion technique.
The patients had a mean (SEM) age of 70.7 (1.5) years and 44 (63%) were men. Two patients died in hospital and 2 died after discharge, giving a procedure-related mortality of 2.8% and a 30-day mortality of 5.7%. Nine patients experienced complications, giving a morbidity rate of 12.8% following the initial procedure. Twenty patients required a second or further procedure. The indications were tube migration in 22 cases, obstruction in 10, and fistula formation in 2 patients. Thirty-day mortality in this group was significantly greater than after a first procedure (7 patients, 20.1%;
P < 0.05). The median survival following insertion of a Wilson-Cook endoprosthesis was 16 weeks.
This study describes a safe, effective method for insertion of an endoprosthesis, with a low morbidity and mortality. The average cost for endoscopic insertion of a Wilson-Cook endoprosthesis in this unit is $1,600, and in view of the short median survival in this group of patients, the introduction of costly self-expanding stents is not warranted without demonstrable benefits in a controlled, prospective, randomized clinical trial. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00104-9 |