On the interpretation of contact angle hysteresis

• Published in: Journal of adhesion science and technology Vol. 16; no. 10; pp. 1367 - 1404
• Main Authors: Chibowski, Emil, Ontiveros-Ortega, Alfonso, Perea-Carpio, Rafael
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Leiden Taylor & Francis Group 01.01.2002; Brill
• Subjects: A NEW APPROACH; Condensed matter: structure, mechanical and thermal properties; CONTACT ANGLES; Exact sciences and technology; HYSTERESIS; Physics; SOLID SURFACE; Solid surfaces and solid-solid interfaces; Solid-fluid interfaces; Surface energy; thermodynamic properties; Surfaces and interfaces; thin films and whiskers (structure and nonelectronic properties); TOTAL SURFACE FREE ENERGY; Liquid solid interface; Theoretical study; Surfaces; Surface tension; Contact angle; Free energy; Surface energy; Hysteresis
• ISSN: 0169-4243; 1568-5616
• DOI: 10.1163/156856102320252859

The determination of solid surface free energy is still an open problem. The method proposed by van Oss and coworkers gives scattered values for apolar Lifshitz-van der Waals and polar (Lewis acid-base) electron-donor and electron-acceptor components for the investigated solid. The values of the components depend on the kind of three probe liquids used for their determination. In this paper a new alternative approach employing contact angle hysteresis is offered. It is based on three measurable parameters: advancing and receding contact angles (hysteresis of the contact angle) and the liquid surface tension. The equation obtained allows calculation of total surface free energy for the investigated solid. The equation is tested using some literature values, as well as advancing and receding contact angles measured for six probe liquids on microscope glass slides and poly(methyl methacrylate) PMMA, plates. It was found that for the tested solids thus calculated total surface free energy depended, to some extent, on the liquid used. Also, the surface free energy components of these solids determined by van Oss and coworkers' method and then the total surface free energy calculated from them varied depending on for which liquid-set the advancing contact angles were used for the calculations. However, the average values of the surface free energy, both for glass and PMMA, determined from these two approaches were in an excellent agreement. Therefore, it was concluded that using other condensed phase (liquid), thus determined value of solid surface free energy is an apparent one, because it seemingly depends not only on the kind but also on the strength of interactions operating across the solid/liquid interface, which are different for different liquids.