Differential effects of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid and N-methyl- d-aspartate receptor antagonists applied to the basal forebrain on cortical acetylcholine release and electroencephalogram desynchronization

It is known that glutamatergic tracts activated from the pedunculopontine tegmentum represent a major input to the nucleus basalis magnocellularis. To establish the role of different ionotropic glutamate receptors in synaptic transmission in the basal forebrain, the pedunculopontine tegmentum was st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeuroscience Vol. 72; no. 2; pp. 419 - 427
Main Authors Rasmusson, D.D., Szerb, J.C., Jordan, J.L.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.05.1996
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:It is known that glutamatergic tracts activated from the pedunculopontine tegmentum represent a major input to the nucleus basalis magnocellularis. To establish the role of different ionotropic glutamate receptors in synaptic transmission in the basal forebrain, the pedunculopontine tegmentum was stimulated in urethane-anesthetized rats and the resulting increases in cortical acetylcholine release and desynchronization of the electroencephalogram were monitored. R(−)-3-(2-car☐ypiperazine-4-yl)-propyl-l-phosphonic acid (CPP), an antagonist at N-methyl- d-aspartate-type glutamate receptors, and 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX), an antagonist at α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA)-type glutamate receptors, were delivered through a microdialysis probe placed in the basal forebrain. The N-methyl- d-aspartate antagonist preferentially inhibited cortical acetylcholine release, while the AMPA antagonist was more powerful in reducing desynchronization. A combination of both N-methyl- d-aspartate and AMPA antagonists abolished the increase in cortical acetylcholine release without reducing desynchronization. The dissociation between increased cortical acetylcholine release and electroencephalogram desynchronization suggests that the activity of corticopetal basal forebrain cholinergic neurons is neither necessary nor sufficient to produce electroencephalogram desynchronization. Rather, the nucleus basalis can probably affect the electroencephalogram by its projections to the thalamus. The reversal of the inhibitory effect of DNQX on the electroencephalogram by CPP may be due to the blockade of N-methyl- d-aspartate receptors on the GABAergic projection from the basal forebrain to the thalamus.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0306-4522
1873-7544
DOI:10.1016/0306-4522(95)00523-4