The regulation of civilian drones' impacts on public safety

• Published in: The computer law and security report Vol. 30; no. 3; pp. 263 - 285
• Main Authors: Clarke, Roger, Bennett Moses, Lyria
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2014; Elsevier
• Subjects: Air safety; Air transportation and traffic; Applied sciences; Aviation safety; Co-regulation; Computer information security; Control; Drone; Exact sciences and technology; Gaps; General aspects; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction; Law; Legislation. Standardization; Liability; Public safety; Remedies; RPA; Self-regulation; Technology-neutrality; UAV; Technology-neutrality; RPA; Aviation safety; Co-regulation; Drone; UAV; Self-regulation; Penal responsibility; Public space; Uncertain system; Unmanned aerial vehicle; Air traffic; Traffic safety; Self regulation; Aircraft
• ISSN: 0267-3649; 1873-6734
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2014.03.007

Because they are airborne artefacts, drones embody threats to people and property, even in normal operation, but especially when malfunctions occur in equipment or in the data communications on which they are heavily dependent. Some natural controls exist over inappropriate drone behaviour. General liability laws provide remedies for harm that arises from drones, and act as a deterrent against irresponsible behaviour. Specific air safety laws do, or may, apply to drones. Co-regulatory mechanisms provide protections, as may industry and organisational self-regulation. However, a review of current and emergent regulatory arrangements identifies a considerable range of gaps and uncertainties that need to be addressed, particularly in relation to small drones, including micro-drones.