Management of necrotizing pancreatitis by repeated operative necrosectomy using a zipper technique

From 1983 to 1995, 72 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis were treated with a general approach involving planned reoperative necrosectomies and interval abdominal wound closure using a zipper. Hospital mortality was 25%. Multiple organ failure without sepsis caused early mortality in 3 of 4 patie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of surgery Vol. 175; no. 2; pp. 91 - 98
Main Authors Tsiotos, Gregory G., León, Enrique Luque-de, Söreide, Jon A., Bannon, Michael P., Zietlow, Scott P., Baerga-Varela, Yvonne, Sarr, Michael G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.02.1998
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:From 1983 to 1995, 72 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis were treated with a general approach involving planned reoperative necrosectomies and interval abdominal wound closure using a zipper. Hospital mortality was 25%. Multiple organ failure without sepsis caused early mortality in 3 of 4 patients and sepsis caused late mortality in 11 of the remaining 14. The mean number of reoperative necrosectomies/debridements was 2 (0 to 7). Fistulae developed in 25 patients (35%); 64% were treated conservatively. Recurrent intraabdominal abscesses developed in 9 patients (13%) but were drained percutaneously in 5. Hemorrhage required intervention in 13 patients (18%). Prognostic factors included APACHE-II score on admission <13 ( P = 0.005), absence of postoperative hemorrhage ( P = 0.01), and peripancreatic tissue necrosis alone ( P <0.05). The zipper approach effectively maximizes the necrosectomy and decreases the incidence of recurrent intraabdominal infection requiring reoperation. APACHE-II score ≥13, extensive parenchymal necrosis, and postoperative hemorrhage signify worse outcome.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00277-8