Effect of MRI on clinical outcome of recurrent fistula-in-ano

Recurrent fistula-in-ano is usually due to sepsis missed at surgery, which can be identified by MRI. We aimed to establish the therapeutic effect of MRI in patients with fistula-in-ano. We did MRI in 71 patients with recurrent fistula, with further surgery done at the discretion of the surgeon. Surg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Lancet (British edition) Vol. 360; no. 9346; pp. 1661 - 1662
Main Authors Buchanan, Gordon, Halligan, Steve, Williams, Andrew, Cohen, C Richard G, Tarroni, Danilo, Phillips, Robin KS, Bartram, Clive I
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Elsevier Ltd 23.11.2002
Lancet
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recurrent fistula-in-ano is usually due to sepsis missed at surgery, which can be identified by MRI. We aimed to establish the therapeutic effect of MRI in patients with fistula-in-ano. We did MRI in 71 patients with recurrent fistula, with further surgery done at the discretion of the surgeon. Surgery and MRI agreed in 40 patients, five (13%) of whom had further recurrence, compared with 16 (52%) of 31 in whom surgery and MRI disagreed (p=0·0005). Further recurrence in all 16 was at the site predicted by MRI. For surgeons who always acted on MRI, further recurrences arose in four of 25 (16%) operations versus eight of 14 (57%) operations for those who ignored imaging (p=0·008). Surgery guided by MRI reduces further recurrence of fistula-in-ano by 75% and should be done in all patients with recurrent fistula.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0140-6736
1474-547X
DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11605-9