Comparison between procedures using SDS for shotgun proteomic analyses of complex samples

Filter‐aided sample preparation (FASP) and a new sample preparation method using a modified commercial SDS removal spin column are quantitatively compared in terms of their performance for shotgun proteomic experiments in three complex proteomic samples: a Saccharomyces cerevisiae lysate (insoluble...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProteomics (Weinheim) Vol. 11; no. 14; pp. 2931 - 2935
Main Authors Bereman, Michael S., Egertson, Jarrett D., MacCoss, Michael J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Weinheim WILEY-VCH Verlag 01.07.2011
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Wiley-VCH
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Filter‐aided sample preparation (FASP) and a new sample preparation method using a modified commercial SDS removal spin column are quantitatively compared in terms of their performance for shotgun proteomic experiments in three complex proteomic samples: a Saccharomyces cerevisiae lysate (insoluble fraction), a Caenorhabditis elegans lysate (soluble fraction), and a human embryonic kidney cell line (HEK293T). The characteristics and total number of peptides and proteins identified are compared between the two procedures. The SDS spin column procedure affords a conservative fourfold improvement in throughput, is more reproducible, less expensive (i.e. requires less materials), and identifies between 30 and 107% more peptides at q≤0.01, than the FASP procedure. The peptides identified by SDS spin column are more hydrophobic than species identified by the FASP procedure as indicated by the distribution of GRAVY scores. Ultimately, these improvements correlate to as great as a 50% increase in protein identifications with two or more peptides.
Bibliography:Genome Training Grant - No. T32 HG000035
Colour Online: See the article online to view Figs. 1, 2, 3 in colour.
istex:275278B37EEBD9FBBB8632CC8127EB0BEA54AB5D
ArticleID:PMIC201100045
National Institutes of Health - No. R01 DK069386; No. U01 HG004263; No. P41 RR011823
ark:/67375/WNG-DDNHW0NF-3
1
2
in colour.
3
See the article online to view Figs.
,
Colour Online
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1615-9853
1615-9861
1615-9861
DOI:10.1002/pmic.201100045