Developing and Submitting Credible Qualitative Manuscripts

The standards used to evaluate qualitative research have been a recurring theme in qualitative research literature for more than 20 years. Included in the discussion of these standards are the qualities of trustworthiness (Y. Lincoln & E. Guba, 1985). More recently, methodological and analytic r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCounselor education and supervision Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 210 - 217
Main Author Kline, William B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2008
American Counseling Association
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subjects
Academic standards
Counselor Training
Education
Evaluation
Evaluation Criteria
Literature
Management
Periodicals
Qualitative Research
Quality management
Scholarly publishing
Writing for Publication
United States
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The standards used to evaluate qualitative research have been a recurring theme in qualitative research literature for more than 20 years. Included in the discussion of these standards are the qualities of trustworthiness (Y. Lincoln & E. Guba, 1985). More recently, methodological and analytic rigor and coherence have also been emphasized (e.g., M. Poggenpoel & C. P. H. Myburgh, 2005). These factors are discussed and conceptualized as presentational rigor. Implications of presentational rigor for designing and conducting qualitative research and preparing manuscripts that are more likely to be published in Counselor Education and Supervision are discussed.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-4557NCGL-F
ArticleID:CEAS52
istex:D5E523341255B043B3238312902E5830279BB21C
ISSN:0011-0035
1556-6978
DOI:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2008.tb00052.x