Comparison of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and Underwater Visual Census for Assessing Macrobenthic Diversity

• Published in: Biology (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 14; no. 7; p. 821
• Main Authors: Zhan, Zifeng, Huo, Weiwei, Xie, Shangwei, Chen, Wandong, Liu, Xinming, Xu, Kuidong, Lei, Yanli
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 06.07.2025; MDPI
• Subjects: Annelida; Aquatic ecosystems; Arthropoda; Biodiversity; biodiversity assessment; Bioinformatics; Biological diversity; Census; Censuses; DNA; DNA barcoding; eDNA; Efficiency; Environmental DNA; Islands; Macrofauna; Marine ecosystems; marine protected area; Protected areas; Protection and preservation; Seawater; Sediments; Sediments (Geology); species detection efficiency; Species richness; Strategic planning (Business); subtidal zone; Taxonomy; China; Germany; Zhejiang China; subtidal zone; species detection efficiency; biodiversity assessment; eDNA; marine protected area
• ISSN: 2079-7737; 2079-7737
• DOI: 10.3390/biology14070821

The rapid advancement of environmental DNA (eDNA) technology has transformed ecological research, particularly in aquatic ecosystems. However, the optimal sampling matrix (e.g., water or sediment) and the potential for eDNA to replace or complement traditional underwater visual census (UVC) remain unclear. Here, we integrate water eDNA, sediment eDNA, and UVC approaches to systematically compare the diversity of benthic macrofauna in the subtidal zones of the Nanji Islands, China. Our results show that sediment eDNA samples exhibited the highest species richness, while UVC had the lowest. Each method revealed distinct species profiles, with relatively few shared taxa at the order level and below. Environmental eDNA showed significant advantages in detecting key phyla such as Annelida and Arthropoda. In contrast, traditional UVC was crucial for identifying certain taxa, such as Bryozoa, which were undetectable by eDNA methods. The low overlap in species detected by these methods underscores their complementary nature, highlighting the necessity of integrating multiple approaches to achieve a more comprehensive and accurate biodiversity assessment. Future research should focus on refining eDNA techniques, such as developing more universal primers, to further enhance their applicability in biodiversity monitoring.