Early Glaucoma Detection Using the Humphrey Matrix Perimeter, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Photography

Purpose To compare the effectiveness of Humphrey Matrix perimetry, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) photography using the Heidelberg Retina Angiograph 1 (HRA1) for early glaucoma detection. Design Cross-sectional comparative study. Participants Seventy-two primary open-angl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOphthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Vol. 114; no. 2; pp. 210 - 215
Main Authors Hong, Samin, MD, Ahn, Hyunseok, MD, Ha, Seung Joo, MD, Yeom, Ho Yeop, MD, Seong, Gong Je, MD, Hong, Young Jae, MD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.02.2007
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose To compare the effectiveness of Humphrey Matrix perimetry, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) photography using the Heidelberg Retina Angiograph 1 (HRA1) for early glaucoma detection. Design Cross-sectional comparative study. Participants Seventy-two primary open-angle glaucoma patients with early-stage visual field defects and 48 healthy controls were included. Methods Measurements using Humphrey Matrix perimetry, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and RNFL photography using HRA1, as well as standard automated perimetry, were obtained. We constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for all available parameters and calculated the area under the ROC curves (AUC) to seek the best discriminating parameter of each test. Subsequently, the ROC curves were calculated for the combinations of the best discriminating parameters of each test to seek the most effective combination for early glaucoma detection. Main Outcome Measure The AUC for various parameters of Humphrey Matrix perimetry, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and RNFL photography using HRA1. Results The AUCs of Humphrey Matrix perimetry, GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and RNFL photography using HRA1 with the best discriminating parameter were 0.990, 0.906, 0.794, and 0.751, respectively. The AUC of the following best combination was 0.972, more than 5 points depressed below the level of 5% on the pattern deviation plot from Humphrey Matrix perimetry, and the nerve fiber indicator was larger than 20 from GDx VCC. Conclusions The AUC of the Humphrey Matrix perimetry was greater than that of the GDx VCC, Stratus OCT, and RNFL photography using HRA1.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0161-6420
1549-4713
DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.021