Utility of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in hemodialyzed patients

Non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) is proposed as a strong predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Measuring non-HDL-C, as total cholesterol minus HDL-C, is convenient for routine practice because, among other advantages, fasting is not required. There are limited data of non-HDL-C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMetabolism, clinical and experimental Vol. 53; no. 8; pp. 1013 - 1015
Main Authors Schreier, Laura, González, Ana I, Elbert, Alicia, Berg, Gabriela, Wikinski, Regina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.08.2004
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0026-0495
1532-8600
DOI10.1016/j.metabol.2004.01.001

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) is proposed as a strong predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Measuring non-HDL-C, as total cholesterol minus HDL-C, is convenient for routine practice because, among other advantages, fasting is not required. There are limited data of non-HDL-C in end-stage renal disease patients. We applied non-HDL-C calculation to 50 chronic renal patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and 20 healthy subjects, apart from measurement of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) HDL, intermediate-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (IDL-C), apoprotein (apo) B, and triglycerides. HD patients presented higher plasma triglycerides and IDL-C and lower HDL-C than the control group, even after adjustment for age ( P < .05). VLDL-C increased in HD patients ( P < .001) while differences in non-HDL-C did not reach significance ( P = .08). To detect which parameter constitutes a better marker of CVD risk among HD patients, a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed considering HD patients in the highest risk group for CVD. In the ROC graphic, the plots of VLDL and IDL-C exhibited the greater observed accuracy and the best performance, while non-HDL-C showed a curve close to the 45° line indicating that this parameter is a poor discriminator for evaluating CVD risk among HD patients. Non-HDL-C calculation, expressing all apo B-containing lipoproteins, may miss the significant contribution of each atherogenic lipoprotein, such as increase in IDL. This observation would not be in agreement with the currently proposed application of non-HDL-C a useful tool for risk assessment among HD patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0026-0495
1532-8600
DOI:10.1016/j.metabol.2004.01.001