Randomised phase-II trial of CAPIRI (capecitabine, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab vs FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of CAPIRI+bevacizumab (Bev) in comparison with FOLFIRI+Bev as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: Patients were randomised to receive either FOLFIRI plus Bev 5 mg kg −1 every 2 weeks (Arm-A) or CAPIRI plu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of cancer Vol. 106; no. 3; pp. 453 - 459
Main Authors Souglakos, J, Ziras, N, Kakolyris, S, Boukovinas, I, Kentepozidis, N, Makrantonakis, P, Xynogalos, S, Christophyllakis, Ch, Kouroussis, Ch, Vamvakas, L, Georgoulias, V, Polyzos, A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 31.01.2012
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of CAPIRI+bevacizumab (Bev) in comparison with FOLFIRI+Bev as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: Patients were randomised to receive either FOLFIRI plus Bev 5 mg kg −1 every 2 weeks (Arm-A) or CAPIRI plus Bev 7.5 mg kg −1 every 3 weeks (Arm-B). Results: Three hundred thirty-three patients (Arm-A=167; Arm-B=166) were enrolled into the study. No difference was observed in median progression-free survival (PFS) (10.0 and 8.9 months; P =0.64), overall survival (25.7 and 27.5 months; P =0.55) or response rates (45.5 and 39.8.7%; P =0.32) for FOLFIRI-Bev and CAPIRI-Bev, respectively. Patients treated with CAPIRI-Bev presented significantly higher incidence of diarrhoea ( P =0.005), febrile neutropenia ( P =0.003) and hand–foot skin reactions ( P =0.02) compared with patients treated with FOLFIRI-Bev. Treatment delays ( P =0.05), dose reduction ( P <0.001) and treatment discontinuation owing to toxicity ( P =0.01) occurred more frequently in the CAPIRI-Bev arm. Conclusion: The PFS of FOLFIRI-BEV is not superior to that observed with the CAPIRI-Bev regimen. CAPIRI-Bev has a less favourable toxicity profile, requiring dose reductions, in order to be considered as an option in first-line treatment of patients with mCRC.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-0920
1532-1827
DOI:10.1038/bjc.2011.594