Randomised phase-II trial of CAPIRI (capecitabine, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab vs FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of CAPIRI+bevacizumab (Bev) in comparison with FOLFIRI+Bev as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: Patients were randomised to receive either FOLFIRI plus Bev 5 mg kg −1 every 2 weeks (Arm-A) or CAPIRI plu...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of cancer Vol. 106; no. 3; pp. 453 - 459 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
31.01.2012
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background:
To compare the efficacy and safety of CAPIRI+bevacizumab (Bev) in comparison with FOLFIRI+Bev as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Methods:
Patients were randomised to receive either FOLFIRI plus Bev 5 mg kg
−1
every 2 weeks (Arm-A) or CAPIRI plus Bev 7.5 mg kg
−1
every 3 weeks (Arm-B).
Results:
Three hundred thirty-three patients (Arm-A=167; Arm-B=166) were enrolled into the study. No difference was observed in median progression-free survival (PFS) (10.0 and 8.9 months;
P
=0.64), overall survival (25.7 and 27.5 months;
P
=0.55) or response rates (45.5 and 39.8.7%;
P
=0.32) for FOLFIRI-Bev and CAPIRI-Bev, respectively. Patients treated with CAPIRI-Bev presented significantly higher incidence of diarrhoea (
P
=0.005), febrile neutropenia (
P
=0.003) and hand–foot skin reactions (
P
=0.02) compared with patients treated with FOLFIRI-Bev. Treatment delays (
P
=0.05), dose reduction (
P
<0.001) and treatment discontinuation owing to toxicity (
P
=0.01) occurred more frequently in the CAPIRI-Bev arm.
Conclusion:
The PFS of FOLFIRI-BEV is not superior to that observed with the CAPIRI-Bev regimen. CAPIRI-Bev has a less favourable toxicity profile, requiring dose reductions, in order to be considered as an option in first-line treatment of patients with mCRC. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0007-0920 1532-1827 |
DOI: | 10.1038/bjc.2011.594 |