Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Influenza A/H5N1 Vaccine Given with or without Aluminum Hydroxide to Healthy Adults: Results of a Phase I–II Randomized Clinical Trial

Background. Dose-sparing strategies are being explored for vaccines against pandemic influenza. We evaluated the dose-sparing potential of aluminum hydroxide (AlOH) adjuvant. Methods. A total of 600 healthy subjects (age, 18–49 years) were randomized to receive 2 vaccinations 1 month apart with subv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of infectious diseases Vol. 198; no. 9; pp. 1309 - 1316
Main Authors Keitel, Wendy A., Campbell, James D., Treanor, John J., Walter, Emmanuel B., Patel, Shital M., He, Fenhua, Noah, Diana L., Hill, Heather
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chicago, IL The University of Chicago Press 01.11.2008
University of Chicago Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI10.1086/592172

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background. Dose-sparing strategies are being explored for vaccines against pandemic influenza. We evaluated the dose-sparing potential of aluminum hydroxide (AlOH) adjuvant. Methods. A total of 600 healthy subjects (age, 18–49 years) were randomized to receive 2 vaccinations 1 month apart with subvirion inactivated influenza A/H5N1 vaccine containing 7.5, 15, or 45 µg of hemagglutinin (HA), with or without 600 µg of aluminum hydroxide (AlOH), or 3.75 µg of HA, with or without 300 µg of AlOH. Serum specimens were obtained for antibody assays before and 1 month after each vaccination. Results. All formulations were safe. Injection site discomfort was more frequent in groups given vaccines with AlOH. Dose-related increases in antibody responses were noted after both vaccinations (P < .001): geometric mean titers of hemagglutination inhibition antibody in vaccines with and without AlOH, respectively, were 5.4 and 5.4 for subjects who received 3.75 µg of HA, 7.7 and 5.3 for those who received 7.5 µg of HA, 8.1 and 8.5 for those who received 15 µg of HA, and 14.8 and 12 for those who received 45 µg of HA. A ⩾4-fold increase in titer was observed in 2% and 2% of subjects who received 3.75 µg of HA with or without AlOH, respectively; in 14% and 0% who received 7 µg of HA; in 14% and 13% who received 15 µg of HA; and in 33% and 25% who received 45 µg of HA. Addition of AlOH enhanced responses only for subjects who received 7.5 µg of HA, but responses in subjects who received 7.5 µg of HA without AlOH were unexpectedly low. Conclusion. Overall, a meaningful beneficial effect of AlOH adjuvant was not observed. Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00296634.
Bibliography:istex:87FF2FB866D08A2DF7C9D70B7D292E5BBCA4EBBD
ark:/67375/HXZ-9JPHQPNC-X
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI:10.1086/592172