Transferring subsidiary knowledge in the global learning context

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore organizational factors that affect the transfer of subsidiary knowledge to both parent companies and peer subsidiaries.Design methodology approach - The hypotheses are tested using multivariate regression, based on a survey of 81 foreign subsidiaries...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of knowledge management Vol. 15; no. 3; pp. 478 - 496
Main Authors Miao, Yuzhe, Choe, Soonkyoo, Song, Jaeyong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kempston Emerald Group Publishing Limited 01.01.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore organizational factors that affect the transfer of subsidiary knowledge to both parent companies and peer subsidiaries.Design methodology approach - The hypotheses are tested using multivariate regression, based on a survey of 81 foreign subsidiaries in South Korea.Findings - The findings show that organizational factors that affect the transfer of subsidiary knowledge differ according to whether the recipient is the parent or the peer subsidiary. Subsidiary-to-parent knowledge flow is facilitated by establishing efficient formal mechanisms such as an expatriation policy, a subsidiary performance evaluation system, etc., whereas knowledge transfer to peer subsidiaries is enhanced by the length of a subsidiary's operation period and the frequency of its managers' communications with other managers in peer subsidiaries.Practical implications - This analysis suggests that managers of multinational companies should apply different approaches in managing these two distinct knowledge flow patterns in the MNC network.Originality value - This study offers new insights into the challenges of global learning by highlighting the difficulty of transferring subsidiary knowledge to peer subsidiaries through formal organizational apparatuses.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1367-3270
1758-7484
DOI:10.1108/13673271111137448