Conditional Probability and the Cognitive Science of Conditional Reasoning

:  This paper addresses the apparent mismatch between the normative and descriptive literatures in the cognitive science of conditional reasoning. Descriptive psychological theories still regard material implication as the normative theory of the conditional. However, over the last 20 years in the p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMind & language Vol. 18; no. 4; pp. 359 - 379
Main Authors Oaksford, Mike, Chater, Nick
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2003
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary::  This paper addresses the apparent mismatch between the normative and descriptive literatures in the cognitive science of conditional reasoning. Descriptive psychological theories still regard material implication as the normative theory of the conditional. However, over the last 20 years in the philosophy of language and logic the idea that material implication can account for everyday indicative conditionals has been subject to severe criticism. The majority view is now apparently in favour of a subjective conditional probability interpretation. A comparative model fitting exercise is presented that shows that a conditional probability model can explain as much of the data on indicative conditional reasoning tasks as psychological theories that supplement material implication with various rationally unjustified processing assumptions. Consequently, when people are asked to solve laboratory reasoning tasks, they can be seen as simply generalising their everyday probabilistic reasoning strategies to this novel context.
Bibliography:ArticleID:MILA232
istex:E6A85AD493F50ED91655F0DD61EE9C67403236D7
ark:/67375/WNG-9PQ9TNSN-Q
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0268-1064
1468-0017
DOI:10.1111/1468-0017.00232