Quantifying the structural uncertainty of the aerosol mixing state representation in a modal model

Aerosol mixing state is an important emergent property that affects aerosol radiative forcing and aerosol–cloud interactions, but it has not been easy to constrain this property globally. This study aims to verify the global distribution of aerosol mixing state represented by modal models. To quanti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAtmospheric chemistry and physics Vol. 21; no. 23; pp. 17727 - 17741
Main Authors Zheng, Zhonghua, West, Matthew, Zhao, Lei, Ma, Po-Lun, Liu, Xiaohong, Riemer, Nicole
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Katlenburg-Lindau Copernicus GmbH 03.12.2021
Copernicus Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aerosol mixing state is an important emergent property that affects aerosol radiative forcing and aerosol–cloud interactions, but it has not been easy to constrain this property globally. This study aims to verify the global distribution of aerosol mixing state represented by modal models. To quantify the aerosol mixing state, we used the aerosol mixing state indices for submicron aerosol based on the mixing of optically absorbing and non-absorbing species (χo), the mixing of primary carbonaceous and non-primary carbonaceous species (χc), and the mixing of hygroscopic and non-hygroscopic species (χh). To achieve a spatiotemporal comparison, we calculated the mixing state indices using output from the Community Earth System Model with the four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) and compared the results with the mixing state indices from a benchmark machine-learned model trained on high-detail particle-resolved simulations from the particle-resolved stochastic aerosol model PartMC-MOSAIC. The two methods yielded very different spatial patterns of the mixing state indices. In some regions, the yearly averaged χ value computed by the MAM4 model differed by up to 70 percentage points from the benchmark values. These errors tended to be zonally structured, with the MAM4 model predicting a more internally mixed aerosol at low latitudes and a more externally mixed aerosol at high latitudes compared to the benchmark. Our study quantifies potential model bias in simulating mixing state in different regions and provides insights into potential improvements to model process representation for a more realistic simulation of aerosols towards better quantification of radiative forcing and aerosol–cloud interactions.
Bibliography:PNNL-SA-172111
State of Illinois
National Science Foundation (NSF)
SC0019192; AGS-1254428; 74358; OCI-0725070; ACI-1238993; AC05-76RL01830
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
ISSN:1680-7324
1680-7316
1680-7324
DOI:10.5194/acp-21-17727-2021