Combining passive samplers and biomonitors to evaluate endocrine disrupting compounds in a wastewater treatment plant by LC/MS/MS and bioassay analyses

Two types of integrative sampling approaches (passive samplers and biomonitors) were tested for their sampling characteristics of selected endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs). Chemical analyses (LC/MS/MS) were used to determine the amounts of five EDCs (nonylphenol, bisphenol A, estrone, 17β-estra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental pollution (1987) Vol. 157; no. 10; pp. 2716 - 2721
Main Authors Liscio, C., Magi, E., Di Carro, M., Suter, M.J.-F., Vermeirssen, E.L.M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2009
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Two types of integrative sampling approaches (passive samplers and biomonitors) were tested for their sampling characteristics of selected endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs). Chemical analyses (LC/MS/MS) were used to determine the amounts of five EDCs (nonylphenol, bisphenol A, estrone, 17β-estradiol and 17α-ethinylestradiol) in polar organic chemical integrative samplers (POCIS) and freshwater mussels ( Unio pictorum); both had been deployed in the influent and effluent of a municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) in Genoa, Italy. Estrogenicity of the POCIS samples was assessed using the yeast estrogen screen (YES). Estradiol equivalent values derived from the bioassay showed a positive correlation with estradiol equivalents calculated from chemical analyses data. As expected, the amount of estrogens and EEQ values in the effluent were lower than those in the influent. Passive sampling proved to be the preferred method for assessing the presence of these compounds since employing mussels had several disadvantages both in sampling efficiency and sample analyses. Passive sampling and biomonitoring were used to determine the amounts of endocrine disrupting compounds in wastewaters.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.04.034
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0269-7491
1873-6424
DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2009.04.034