The Prevalence and Correlates of Nonaffective Psychosis in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R)

To estimate the prevalence and correlates of clinician-diagnosed DSM-IV nonaffective psychosis (NAP) in a national household survey. Data came from the United States National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). A screen for NAP was followed by blinded sub-sample clinical reappraisal interviews....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBiological psychiatry (1969) Vol. 58; no. 8; pp. 668 - 676
Main Authors Kessler, Ronald C., Birnbaum, Howard, Demler, Olga, Falloon, Ian R.H., Gagnon, Elizabeth, Guyer, Margaret, Howes, Mary J., Kendler, Kenneth S., Shi, Lizheng, Walters, Ellen, Wu, Eric Q.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 15.10.2005
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To estimate the prevalence and correlates of clinician-diagnosed DSM-IV nonaffective psychosis (NAP) in a national household survey. Data came from the United States National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). A screen for NAP was followed by blinded sub-sample clinical reappraisal interviews. Logistic regression was used to impute clinical diagnoses to respondents who were not re-interviewed. The method of Multiple Imputation (MI) was used to estimate prevalence and correlates. Clinician-diagnosed NAP was well predicted by the screen (area under the curve [AUC] = .80). The MI prevalence estimate of NAP (standard error in parentheses) is 5.0 (2.6) per 1000 population lifetime and 3.0 (2.2) per 1000 past 12 months. The vast majority (79.4%) of lifetime and 12-month (63.7%) cases met criteria for other DSM-IV hierarchy-free disorders. Fifty-eight percent of 12-month cases were in treatment, most in the mental health specialty sector. The screen for NAP in the NCS-R greatly improved on previous epidemiological surveys in reducing false positives, but coding of open-ended screening scale responses was still needed to achieve accurate prediction. The lower prevalence estimate than in total-population incidence studies raises concerns that systematic nonresponse bias causes downward bias in survey prevalence estimates of NAP.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0006-3223
1873-2402
DOI:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.034