Review of hypotheses for fouling during beer clarification using membranes

► Fouling hypotheses of beer microfiltration are reviewed. ► Fouling models are formulated and compared to experimental data. ► Model based control of beer microfiltration is now possible. Hypotheses concerning the fouling of membranes during beer clarification via crossflow microfiltration are revi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of membrane science Vol. 396; pp. 22 - 31
Main Authors van der Sman, R.G.M., Vollebregt, H.M., Mepschen, A., Noordman, T.R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.04.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► Fouling hypotheses of beer microfiltration are reviewed. ► Fouling models are formulated and compared to experimental data. ► Model based control of beer microfiltration is now possible. Hypotheses concerning the fouling of membranes during beer clarification via crossflow microfiltration are reviewed. Beer has been classified into three groups of components, each having a different kind of fouling mechanisms – but also having interactions with other modes of fouling. The membrane fouling also strongly depends on the characteristics of the membrane. An optimal pore diameter and membrane morphology can be identified. The various hypotheses have been formulated in terms of mathematical models, which are tested using experimental data of dead-end filtration of beer. This comparison shows that our hypotheses are quite likely to be valid, and form a good basis for further model-based exploration of the optimization of the beer clarification process. Due to the similarity of beer with biotechnological broths, the presented fouling hypotheses extend beyond the original application of beer microfiltration.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.051
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0376-7388
1873-3123
DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.051