Clinical and structural outcome 20 years after repair of massive rotator cuff tears

• Published in: Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 521 - 526
• Main Authors: Collin, Philippe, Betz, Michael, Herve, Anthony, Walch, Gilles, Mansat, Pierre, Favard, Luc, Colmar, Michel, François Kempf, Jean, Thomazeau, Hervé, Gerber, Christian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.03.2020
• Subjects: anatomical outcomes; clinical outcomes; long term; Massive cuff tear; open repair; structural outcomes; Treatment Study; Level IV; clinical outcomes; anatomical outcomes; structural outcomes; Case Series; long term; open repair; Massive cuff tear
• ISSN: 1058-2746; 1532-6500
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.031

Short- and mid-term outcomes after massive cuff tear repair are well reported, but there is no documentation of the clinical and structural outcomes at 20 years of follow-up. The hypothesis of the present study was that at 20 years, deterioration of the shoulder would have occurred and led to a substantial number of reoperations. The authors retrospectively recalled all 127 patients operated for massive rotator cuff tears in 1994 at 6 different centers. At the 20-year follow-up, 26 patients died and 35 were lost to follow-up. Thirteen (10.2%) had been reoperated. This left 53 patients for personal clinical assessment. Forty-nine consented to standardized radiographic evaluation for assessment of osteoarthritis, 36 patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging, allowing assessment of tendon healing, atrophy, and fatty infiltration (FI) of the cuff muscles. The final Constant-Murley score (CS) was 68 ± 17.7 (range, 8-91) vs. 44 ± 15.3 (range, 13-74) preoperatively (P < .05). The final Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) was 73% ± 23% (range, 0-100). Retears (Sugaya IV and V) were found in 17 cases (47%). Nine patients (17%) had cuff tear arthropathy (Hamada stage 4). The CS and SSV for the shoulders with FI stages III or IV were significantly inferior (53 ± 19 points and 65% ± 14% respectively) than for those with FI stages 0-II (respectively, 71.6 ± 6 points and 73% ± 4%) (P < .05). Twenty years after surgical repair of massive rotator cuff tears, the functional scores remain satisfactory, and the rate of revision is low.