Bats and belief: A sequential qualitative study in Thailand

• Published in: Heliyon Vol. 6; no. 6; p. e04208
• Main Authors: Suwannarong, Kanokwan, Balthip, Karnsunaphat, Kanthawee, Phitsanuruk, Suwannarong, Kangsadal, Khiewkhern, Santisith, Lantican, Cecilia, Ponlap, Thanomsin, Bupha, Nisachon, Amonsin, Alongkorn
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2020; Elsevier
• Subjects: Attitude; Bat; Belief; Conservation; Contact; Health sciences; Infectious disease; Interface; Perception; Public health; Religion; Sociology; Thailand; Belief; Health sciences; Attitude; Conservation; Religion; Thailand; Contact; Infectious disease; Bat; Sociology; Perception; Interface; Public health
• ISSN: 2405-8440; 2405-8440
• DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04208

Bats are wildlife and distribute globally. In Thailand, there are hundreds of bat species in different locations within four regions. However, few motivations and influences for having contact with bats have been documented. This sequential qualitative study was conducted in ten provinces representing the four regions of Thailand from September 2016 to June 2017. The study was designed to obtain information on villagers' attitudes, perceptions, beliefs and cultural contexts in relation to bats. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with 305 respondents. Of these respondents, 142 (46.6%) reported coming into contact with bats through various activities, such as hunting, eating, cooking, collecting bat guano, cleaning bat feces, and finding carcasses in houses and communities. Villagers called bats by different names in different regions. They reported having been in contact with bats in different ways based on occupations, bat species, bat habitats, attitudes, perceptions, beliefs toward bats, and cultural contexts. Villagers in the northern and northeastern regions reported having regularly eaten bats. In contrast, the respondents in the central region did not eat bats due to local norms, religious beliefs, and regulations. By ethnicity, the Blu and Thai Dum groups reported coming into contact with and eating bats more often than the Thais. Our results provide evidence-based information on the human-bat interface in different regions in Thailand. The results of this qualitative study could be useful for strategic planning of proper education and interventions for bat conservation, bat contact behavior, and risk of bat-borne diseases among villagers in the future. Attitude; Bat; Belief; Contact; Interface; Perception; Thailand, Conservation; Health sciences; Infectious disease; Religion; Sociology; Public health