Sensitivity of meteorological-forcing resolution on hydrologic variables
Projecting the spatiotemporal changes in water resources under a no-analog future climate requires physically based integrated hydrologic models which simulate the transfer of water and energy across the earth's surface. These models show promise in the context of unprecedented climate extremes...
Saved in:
Published in | Hydrology and earth system sciences Vol. 24; no. 7; pp. 3451 - 3474 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Katlenburg-Lindau
Copernicus GmbH
09.07.2020
European Geosciences Union (EGU) Copernicus Publications |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Projecting the spatiotemporal changes in water resources under a no-analog
future climate requires physically based integrated hydrologic models which simulate the transfer of water and energy across the earth's surface. These models show promise in the context of unprecedented climate extremes given their reliance on the underlying physics of the system as opposed to
empirical relationships. However, these techniques are plagued by several
sources of uncertainty, including the inaccuracy of input datasets such as
meteorological forcing. These datasets, usually derived from climate models
or satellite-based products, are typically only resolved on the order of
tens to hundreds of kilometers, while hydrologic variables of interest (e.g., discharge and groundwater levels) require a resolution at much smaller scales. In this work, a high-resolution hydrologic model is forced with various resolutions of meteorological forcing (0.5 to 40.5 km) generated by a dynamical downscaling analysis from the regional climate model Weather
Research and Forecasting (WRF). The Cosumnes watershed, which spans the
Sierra Nevada and Central Valley interface of California (USA), exhibits
semi-natural flow conditions due to its rare undammed river basin and is
used here as a test bed to illustrate potential impacts of various
resolutions of meteorological forcing on snow accumulation and snowmelt,
surface runoff, infiltration, evapotranspiration, and groundwater levels.
Results show that the errors in spatial distribution patterns impact land
surface processes and can be delayed in time. Localized biases in
groundwater levels can be as large as 5–10 m and 3 m in surface water. Most hydrologic variables reveal that biases are seasonally and
spatially dependent, which can have serious implications for model
calibration and ultimately water management decisions. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | AC02-05CH11231 USDOE Office of Science (SC) |
ISSN: | 1607-7938 1027-5606 1607-7938 |
DOI: | 10.5194/hess-24-3451-2020 |