Fate of autologous and fresh-frozen allogeneic block bone grafts used for ridge augmentation. A CBCT-based analysis

Objectives To evaluate dimensional changes in autologous (AT) and fresh‐frozen allogeneic (AL) block bone grafts 6 months after alveolar ridge augmentation. Material and methods Twenty‐six partially or totally edentulous patients treated either with fresh‐frozen AL bone or AT bone onlay block grafts...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical oral implants research Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 167 - 173
Main Authors Spin-Neto, Rubens, Stavropoulos, Andreas, Pereira, Luís Antônio Violin Dias, Marcantonio Jr, Elcio, Wenzel, Ann
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Denmark Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives To evaluate dimensional changes in autologous (AT) and fresh‐frozen allogeneic (AL) block bone grafts 6 months after alveolar ridge augmentation. Material and methods Twenty‐six partially or totally edentulous patients treated either with fresh‐frozen AL bone or AT bone onlay block grafts prior to implant placement (13 patients in each group), were included in this analysis. Patients received CBCT (i‐CAT Classic) examinations prior to surgery and 14 days and 6 months after grafting. Differences in alveolar ridge area among the various observation times were evaluated by planimetric measurements on two‐dimensional CBCT images of the grafted regions. Nineteen grafted blocks from each group were evaluated. Results Significant increase in alveolar ridge dimensions, allowing implant placement, was obtained with both types of grafts 6 months after grafting; no significant differences in alveolar ridge area were observed between the groups at the various observation times. However, graft resorption in the AL group was significantly larger compared to that in the AT group at 6 months. Conclusions Larger bone graft resorption was seen in patients treated with fresh‐frozen AL bone than in those treated with AT bone 6 months following alveolar ridge augmentation.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-V9FGRVQS-L
ArticleID:CLR2324
CNPq
Brazilian agencies Fapesp - No. 2008/09207-9
CAPES - No. 0050/10-5
istex:153CA75EA887CB04259611073BDF9F22216021A7
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0905-7161
1600-0501
1600-0501
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02324.x