Unchanged carbon balance driven by equivalent responses of production and respiration to climate change in a mixed‐grass prairie

• Published in: Global change biology Vol. 22; no. 5; pp. 1857 - 1866
• Main Authors: Xu, Xia, Shi, Zheng, Chen, Xuecheng, Lin, Yang, Niu, Shuli, Jiang, Lifen, Luo, Ruiseng, Luo, Yiqi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Science 01.05.2016; Blackwell Publishing Ltd; Wiley-Blackwell
• Subjects: altered precipitation; Carbon Cycle; Climate Change; clipping; ecosystem respiration; Ecosystems; Global Warming; Grassland; grasslands; gross primary production; Herbivory; net ecosystem exchange; net primary production; Oklahoma; Precipitation; Rain; Respiration; warming; Oklahoma; USA, Oklahoma; clipping; grasslands; net ecosystem exchange; ecosystem respiration; altered precipitation; warming; gross primary production; net primary production
• ISSN: 1354-1013; 1365-2486
• DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13192

Responses of grassland carbon (C) cycling to climate change and land use remain a major uncertainty in model prediction of future climate. To explore the impacts of global change on ecosystem C fluxes and the consequent changes in C storage, we have conducted a field experiment with warming (+3 °C), altered precipitation (doubled and halved), and annual clipping at the end of growing seasons in a mixed‐grass prairie in Oklahoma, USA, from 2009 to 2013. Results showed that although ecosystem respiration (ER) and gross primary production (GPP) negatively responded to warming, net ecosystem exchange of CO₂ (NEE) did not significantly change under warming. Doubled precipitation stimulated and halved precipitation suppressed ER and GPP equivalently, with the net outcome being unchanged in NEE. These results indicate that warming and altered precipitation do not necessarily have profound impacts on ecosystem C storage. In addition, we found that clipping enhanced NEE due to a stronger positive response of GPP compared to ER, indicating that clipping could potentially be an effective land practice that could increase C storage. No significant interactions between warming, altered precipitation, and clipping were observed. Meanwhile, we found that belowground net primary production (BNPP) in general was sensitive to climate change and land use though no significant changes were found in NPP across treatments. Moreover, negative correlations of the ER/GPP ratio with soil temperature and moisture did not differ across treatments, highlighting the roles of abiotic factors in mediating ecosystem C fluxes in this grassland. Importantly, our results suggest that belowground C cycling (e.g., BNPP) could respond to climate change with no alterations in ecosystem C storage in the same period.