Stromal-derived interleukin 6 drives epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and therapy resistance in esophageal adenocarcinoma
Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has a dismal prognosis, and survival benefits of recent multimodality treatments remain small. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are known to contribute to poor outcome by conferring therapy resistance to various cancer types, but this has not been explored in EAC....
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 116; no. 6; pp. 2237 - 2242 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
05.02.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has a dismal prognosis, and survival benefits of recent multimodality treatments remain small. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are known to contribute to poor outcome by conferring therapy resistance to various cancer types, but this has not been explored in EAC. Importantly, a targeted strategy to circumvent CAF-induced resistance has yet to be identified. By using EAC patient-derived CAFs, organoid cultures, and xenograft models we identified IL-6 as the stromal driver of therapy resistance in EAC. IL-6 activated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer cells, which was accompanied by enhanced treatment resistance, migratory capacity, and clonogenicity. Inhibition of IL-6 restored drug sensitivity in patient-derived organoid cultures and cell lines. Analysis of patient gene expression profiles identified ADAM12 as a noninflammation-related serum-borne marker for IL-6–producing CAFs, and serum levels of this marker predicted unfavorable responses to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in EAC patients. These results demonstrate a stromal contribution to therapy resistance in EAC. This signaling can be targeted to resensitize EAC to therapy, and its activity can be measured using serum-borne markers. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | 1E.A.E. and A.P.v.d.Z. contributed equally to this work. Author contributions: E.A.E., J.P.M., H.W.M.v.L., and M.F.B. designed research; E.A.E., A.P.v.d.Z., A.S., A.C., S.H., R.R., M.K., C.W., G.K.J.H., and M.F.B. performed research; S.L.M., K.K.K., C.J.A.P., M.I.v.B.H., S.S.G., O.M.v.D., and M.C.C.M.H. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; E.A.E., A.P.v.d.Z., A.S., A.C., S.L.M., H.W.M.v.L., and M.F.B. analyzed data; H.W.M.v.L. and M.F.B. supervised the project; and E.A.E., A.P.v.d.Z., and M.F.B. wrote the paper. Edited by Tadamitsu Kishimoto, Laboratory of Immune Regulation, World Premier Immunology Frontier Research Centre, Osaka University, Suita, Japan, and approved December 19, 2018 (received for review December 3, 2018) 2H.W.M.v.L. and M.F.B. contributed equally to this work. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1820459116 |