Global patterns and climatic controls of belowground net carbon fixation

Carbon allocated underground through belowground net primary production represents the main input to soil organic carbon. This is of significant importance, because soil organic carbon is the third-largest carbon stock after oceanic and geological pools. However, drivers and controls of belowground...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 117; no. 33; pp. 20038 - 20043
Main Authors Gherardi, Laureano A., Sala, Osvaldo E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 18.08.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Carbon allocated underground through belowground net primary production represents the main input to soil organic carbon. This is of significant importance, because soil organic carbon is the third-largest carbon stock after oceanic and geological pools. However, drivers and controls of belowground productivity and the fraction of total carbon fixation allocated belowground remain uncertain. Here we estimate global belowground net primary productivity as the difference between satellite-based total net primary productivity and field observations of aboveground net primary production and assess climatic controls among biomes. On average, belowground carbon productivity is estimated as 24.7 Pg y−1, accounting for 46% of total terrestrial carbon fixation. Across biomes, belowground productivity increases with mean annual precipitation, although the rate of increase diminishes with increasing precipitation. The fraction of total net productivity allocated belowground exceeds 50% in a large fraction of terrestrial ecosystems and decreases from arid to humid ecosystems. This work adds to our understanding of the belowground carbon productivity response to climate change and provides a comprehensive global quantification of root/belowground productivity that will aid the budgeting and modeling of the global carbon cycle.
Bibliography:Author contributions: L.A.G. and O.E.S. conceived the idea for the project; L.A.G. collected, compiled, and analyzed the data; and L.A.G. and O.E.S. wrote the paper.
Edited by William H. Schlesinger, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY, and approved July 1, 2020 (received for review April 8, 2020)
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.2006715117