Changes in belowground biodiversity during ecosystem development

Belowground organisms play critical roles in maintaining multiple ecosystem processes, including plant productivity, decomposition, and nutrient cycling. Despite their importance, however, we have a limited understanding of how and why belowground biodiversity (bacteria, fungi, protists, and inverte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 116; no. 14; pp. 6891 - 6896
Main Authors Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel, Bardgett, Richard D., Vitousek, Peter M., Maestre, Fernando T., Williams, Mark A., Eldridge, David J., Lambers, Hans, Neuhauser, Sigrid, Gallardo, Antonio, García-Velázquez, Laura, Sala, Osvaldo E., Abades, Sebastián R., Alfaro, Fernando D., Berhe, Asmeret A., Bowker, Matthew A., Currier, Courtney M., Cutler, Nick A., Hart, Stephen C., Hayes, Patrick E., Hseu, Zeng-Yei, Kirchmair, Martin, Peña-Ramírez, Victor M., Pérez, Cecilia A., Reed, Sasha C., Santos, Fernanda, Siebe, Christina, Sullivan, Benjamin W., Weber-Grullon, Luis, Fierer, Noah
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 02.04.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Belowground organisms play critical roles in maintaining multiple ecosystem processes, including plant productivity, decomposition, and nutrient cycling. Despite their importance, however, we have a limited understanding of how and why belowground biodiversity (bacteria, fungi, protists, and invertebrates) may change as soils develop over centuries to millennia (pedogenesis). Moreover, it is unclear whether belowground biodiversity changes during pedogenesis are similar to the patterns observed for aboveground plant diversity. Here we evaluated the roles of resource availability, nutrient stoichiometry, and soil abiotic factors in driving belowground biodiversity across 16 soil chronosequences (from centuries to millennia) spanning a wide range of globally distributed ecosystem types. Changes in belowground biodiversity during pedogenesis followed two main patterns. In lower-productivity ecosystems (i.e., drier and colder), increases in belowground biodiversity tracked increases in plant cover. In more productive ecosystems (i.e., wetter and warmer), increased acidification during pedogenesis was associated with declines in belowground biodiversity. Changes in the diversity of bacteria, fungi, protists, and invertebrates with pedogenesis were strongly and positively correlated worldwide, highlighting that belowground biodiversity shares similar ecological drivers as soils and ecosystems develop. In general, temporal changes in aboveground plant diversity and belowground biodiversity were not correlated, challenging the common perception that belowground biodiversity should follow similar patterns to those of plant diversity during ecosystem development. Taken together, our findings provide evidence that ecological patterns in belowground biodiversity are predictable across major globally distributed ecosystem types and suggest that shifts in plant cover and soil acidification during ecosystem development are associated with changes in belowground biodiversity over centuries tomillennia.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
2Present address: Crop, Livestock, and Environment Division, Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences, Tsukuba, 305-8656 Ibaraki, Japan.
Edited by David Tilman, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, and approved February 8, 2019 (received for review October 26, 2018)
Author contributions: M.D.-B. and N.F. designed research; M.D.-B., R.D.B., P.M.V., F.T.M., M.A.W., D.J.E., H.L., S.N., A.G., L.G.-V., O.E.S., S.R.A., F.D.A., A.A.B., M.A.B., C.M.C., N.A.C., S.C.H., P.E.H., Z.-Y.H., M.K., V.M.P.-R., C.A.P., S.C.R., F.S., C.S., B.W.S., L.W.-G., and N.F. performed research; M.D.-B., F.T.M., A.G., L.G.-V., and N.F. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; M.D.-B., R.D.B., P.M.V., F.T.M., M.A.W., D.J.E., H.L., S.N., A.G., O.E.S., and N.F. analyzed data; and M.D.-B. and N.F. wrote the paper, with all authors contributing to the drafts.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1818400116