Direct experimental evidence of physical origin of electronic phase separation in manganites
Electronic phase separation in complex oxides is the inhomogeneous spatial distribution of electronic phases, involving length scales much larger than those of structural defects or nonuniform distribution of chemical dopants. While experimental efforts focused on phase separation and established it...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 117; no. 13; pp. 7090 - 7094 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
31.03.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Electronic phase separation in complex oxides is the inhomogeneous spatial distribution of electronic phases, involving length scales much larger than those of structural defects or nonuniform distribution of chemical dopants. While experimental efforts focused on phase separation and established its correlation with nonlinear responses under external stimuli, it remains controversial whether phase separation requires quenched disorder for its realization. Early theory predicted that if perfectly “clean” samples could be grown, both phase separation and nonlinearities would be replaced by a bicritical-like phase diagram. Here, using a layer-by-layer superlattice growth technique we fabricate a fully chemically ordered “tricolor” manganite superlattice, and compare its properties with those of isovalent alloyed manganite films. Remarkably, the fully ordered manganite does not exhibit phase separation, while its presence is pronounced in the alloy. This suggests that chemical-dopinginduced disorder is crucial to stabilize the potentially useful nonlinear responses of manganites, as theory predicted. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 1L.D. and W.Y. contributed equally to this work. Author contributions: J.S. designed research; T.M., L.D., W.Y., J.N., C.Z., J.E., S.W., H. Liu, H. Lin, Y.Y., Q.S., P.C., Y.Z., T.Y., X.Z., X.G., C.X., M.T., and H.X. performed research; T.M., C.Z., J.E., T.Y., X.Z., X.W., H.X., E.D., L.Y., and J.S. analyzed data; and T.M., E.D., L.Y., and J.S. wrote the paper. Edited by Tsuyoshi Kimura, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Gabriel Aeppli February 19, 2020 (received for review November 20, 2019) |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1920502117 |