In Vitro Dose Response to Different GPIIb/IIIa-Antagonists: Inter-Laboratory Comparison of Various Platelet Function Tests

Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the inter- and intra-laboratory variation of the concentration–response to the GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists abciximab and eptifibatide on platelet aggregometry and to compare results with flow cytometric tests as well as the rapid platelet function analyser (RPFA)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThrombosis research Vol. 102; no. 1; pp. 39 - 48
Main Authors Harder, S, Klinkhardt, U, Graff, J, Westrup, D, Kirchmaier, C.M, Glusa, E, Mascelli, M.A, Marciniak, S.J, Just, A, Lösche, W, Breddin, H.K
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2001
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the inter- and intra-laboratory variation of the concentration–response to the GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists abciximab and eptifibatide on platelet aggregometry and to compare results with flow cytometric tests as well as the rapid platelet function analyser (RPFA). Methods: In five different laboratory sites, blood from three to five healthy donors was spiked with abciximab or eptifibatide, followed by the assessment of: (1) aggregometry (anticoagulant: sodium citrate 3.18% or hirudin 5 μg/ml); (2) flow cytometry (fibrinogen binding or PAC1-expression), or (3) RPFA. Dose–response curves were established on the basis of a sigmoidal I max-model [ I=( I max* C γ )/(IC 50 γ + C γ )]. Results: For citrated blood, aggregation induced by 20 μM ADP was blocked up to 100% by both GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists, IC 50 values varied between 0.11–0.22 μg/ml for eptifibatide and 1.25–2.3 μg/ml for abciximab. I max of the response to 5 μg/ml collagen ranged from 46% to 100%, and IC 50 values varied between 0.28–0.34 μg/ml for eptifibatide and 2.3–3.8 μg/ml for abciximab. In hirudinized blood, IC 50 values for eptifibatide were 1.5- to 3-fold higher than those obtained with citrated plasma. Inhibition of PAC1-expression by abciximab (IC 50 0.84 μg/ml) showed results similar those of the RPFA (approx. 1.0 μg/ml); larger differences between PAC1 and RPFA results were observed for eptifibatide. Based on aggregometry, eptifibatide concentrations for 80% inhibition varied from 0.27 to 0.55 μg/ml, and were considerably less when the RPFA was taken as basis (0.15 or 0.22 μg/ml). A similar pattern was observed for abciximab. Conclusions: We found quite a low inter- and intra-laboratory variation in the in vitro pharmacodynamic characterization of GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists by aggregometry, making results of these tests obtained from different laboratories during clinical trials at least comparable. The RPFA exhibits a higher sensitivity to inhibitory GPIIb/IIIa-effects, in keeping with the “real” inhibition of the activated receptor (PAC1) as assessed with more elaborate flow cytometry.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0049-3848
1879-2472
DOI:10.1016/S0049-3848(01)00223-7