Small Airways Response to Bronchodilators in Adults with Asthma or COPD: A Systematic Review

• Published in: International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Vol. 16; pp. 3065 - 3082
• Main Authors: Almeshari, Mohammed A, Alobaidi, Nowaf Y, Sapey, Elizabeth, Usmani, Omar, Stockley, Robert A, Stockley, James A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New Zealand Dove Medical Press Limited 01.01.2021; Dove Medical Press Ltd; Dove; Dove Medical Press
• Subjects: Adult; Adults; Asthma; Asthma - diagnosis; Asthma - drug therapy; Bias; bronchodilator; Bronchodilator Agents; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; copd; Cross-Sectional Studies; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Original Research; Physiological aspects; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - drug therapy; Quality standards; Respiratory agents; reversibility; small airways function; Spirometry; Systematic review; United Kingdom; reversibility; asthma; small airways function; COPD; bronchodilator
• ISSN: 1178-2005; 1176-9106; 1178-2005
• DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S331995

Bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) is commonly used in the diagnosis of lung disease. Although small airways dysfunction is a feature of asthma and COPD, physiological tests of small airways are not included in guidelines for BDR testing. This systematic review assessed the current evidence of BDR using small airways function in asthma and COPD. The systematic review used standard methodology with the protocol prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020164140). Electronic medical databases (EMBASE and Medline) were searched using related keywords. Abstracts and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers. Studies that reported the change of physiological small airways function and FEV were included in the review. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCT and NIH quality assessment tool for cohort and cross-sectional studies were used to evaluate the studies. A total of 934 articles were identified, with 12 meeting the inclusion criteria. Ten studies included asthma patients, 1 study included COPD patients and 1 study included both asthma and COPD. A total of 1104 participants were included, of whom 941 were asthmatic, 64 had COPD and 109 were healthy controls. Studies were heterogeneous in design including the device, dose and time intervals for BDR assessment. A small airway BDR was seen for most tests in asthma and COPD, including oscillometry (R5-20, reactance (X5), area of reactance (AX) and resonant frequency (Fres)) and Maximal Mid Expiratory Flow. There is a measurable BDR in the small airways. However, with no consensus on how to assess BDR, studies were heterogeneous. Further research is needed to inform how BDR should be assessed, its clinical impact and place in routine clinical practice.