On the Security of a PUF-Based Authentication and Key Exchange Protocol for IoT Devices

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 23; no. 14; p. 6559
• Main Authors: Sun, Da-Zhi, Gao, Yi-Na, Tian, Yangguang
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 20.07.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Algorithms; authentication; Authentication protocols; Communication; Design; Field programmable gate arrays; impersonation; insider attack; Internet of Things; Investment analysis; key exchange; physically unclonable function; Protocol; Safety and security measures; surveillance; Canada; insider attack; impersonation; surveillance; key exchange; authentication; physically unclonable function
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s23146559

Recently, Roy et al. proposed a physically unclonable function (PUF)-based authentication and key exchange protocol for Internet of Things (IoT) devices. The PUF protocol is efficient, because it integrates both the Node-to-Node (N2N) authentication and the Node-to-Server (N2S) authentication into a standalone protocol. In this paper, we therefore examine the security of the PUF protocol under the assumption of an insider attack. Our cryptanalysis findings are the following. (1) A legitimate but malicious IoT node can monitor the secure communication among the server and any other IoT nodes in both N2N authentication and N2S authentication. (2) A legitimate but malicious IoT node is able to impersonate a target IoT node to cheat the server and any other IoT nodes in N2N authentication and the server in N2S authentication, respectively. (3) A legitimate but malicious IoT node can masquerade as the server to cheat any other target IoT nodes in both N2N authentication and N2S authentication. To the best of our knowledge, our work gives the first non-trivial concrete security analysis for the PUF protocol. In addition, we employ the automatic verification tool of security protocols, i.e., Scyther, to confirm the weaknesses found in the PUF protocol. We finally consider how to prevent weaknesses in the PUF protocol.