Proposal and multicentric validation of a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery ontology

• Published in: Surgical endoscopy Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 2070 - 2077
• Main Authors: Lavanchy, Joël L., Gonzalez, Cristians, Kassem, Hasan, Nett, Philipp C., Mutter, Didier, Padoy, Nicolas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.03.2023; Springer Nature B.V; Springer Verlag (Germany)
• Subjects: Abdominal Surgery; Data science; Gastric Bypass; Gastroenterology; Gastrointestinal surgery; Gynecology; Hepatology; Human health and pathology; Humans; Laparoscopy; Life Sciences; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Obesity, Morbid - surgery; Ontology; Original; Original Article; Postoperative Complications - surgery; Proctology; Reproducibility of Results; Surgery; Treatment Outcome; Inter-rater reliability; Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Ontology; Intra-rater reliability; Surgical data science; surgery
• ISSN: 0930-2794; 1432-2218
• DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09745-2

Background Phase and step annotation in surgical videos is a prerequisite for surgical scene understanding and for downstream tasks like intraoperative feedback or assistance. However, most ontologies are applied on small monocentric datasets and lack external validation. To overcome these limitations an ontology for phases and steps of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is proposed and validated on a multicentric dataset in terms of inter- and intra-rater reliability (inter-/intra-RR). Methods The proposed LRYGB ontology consists of 12 phase and 46 step definitions that are hierarchically structured. Two board certified surgeons (raters) with > 10 years of clinical experience applied the proposed ontology on two datasets: (1) StraBypass40 consists of 40 LRYGB videos from Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France and (2) BernBypass70 consists of 70 LRYGB videos from Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. To assess inter-RR the two raters’ annotations of ten randomly chosen videos from StraBypass40 and BernBypass70 each, were compared. To assess intra-RR ten randomly chosen videos were annotated twice by the same rater and annotations were compared. Inter-RR was calculated using Cohen’s kappa. Additionally, for inter- and intra-RR accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and application dependent metrics were applied. Results The mean ± SD video duration was 108 ± 33 min and 75 ± 21 min in StraBypass40 and BernBypass70, respectively. The proposed ontology shows an inter-RR of 96.8 ± 2.7% for phases and 85.4 ± 6.0% for steps on StraBypass40 and 94.9 ± 5.8% for phases and 76.1 ± 13.9% for steps on BernBypass70. The overall Cohen’s kappa of inter-RR was 95.9 ± 4.3% for phases and 80.8 ± 10.0% for steps. Intra-RR showed an accuracy of 98.4 ± 1.1% for phases and 88.1 ± 8.1% for steps. Conclusion The proposed ontology shows an excellent inter- and intra-RR and should therefore be implemented routinely in phase and step annotation of LRYGB.