Vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis virus tests specific IgG production ability in patients under immunoglobulin substitution therapy

Abstract To assess B-cell function in patients under immunoglobulin (IgG)-replacement therapy, the non-licensed artificial bacteriophage (ΦX174)-neo-antigen may be used despite limited availability and experience. Active immunization against tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is performed in few European...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVaccine Vol. 28; no. 40; pp. 6621 - 6626
Main Authors Seidel, Markus G, Grohmann, Eva, Sadeghi, Kambis, Pollak, Arnold, Heitger, Andreas, Förster-Waldl, Elisabeth
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 14.09.2010
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract To assess B-cell function in patients under immunoglobulin (IgG)-replacement therapy, the non-licensed artificial bacteriophage (ΦX174)-neo-antigen may be used despite limited availability and experience. Active immunization against tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is performed in few European countries. To test the feasibility of using licensed TBE vaccination as (neo-)antigen to determine residual or restored B-cell function in patients under regular IgG substitution, TBE-IgG levels were analyzed in 18 patients with ≥1–2 years of regular intravenous or subcutaneous IgG substitution and in pharmaceutical IgG-preparations ( n = 21 batches, 10 products). Six individuals were boosted against TBE. Although TBE-specific IgG was detectable in concentrates (281–57,100 VieU/0.5 μL), levels were only borderline in patient sera ( n = 31, 18 individuals; median 132 VieU; positive >155). Thus, TBE vaccination may be used to test B-cell function under IgG replacement therapy because IgG substitution appears insufficient to yield protective TBE-specific antibody levels in children.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.07.027