Structural basis for dynamic regulation of the human 26S proteasome

The proteasome is the major engine of protein degradation in all eukaryotic cells. At the heart of this machine is a heterohexameric ring of AAA (ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities) proteins that unfolds ubiquitylated target proteins that are concurrently translocated into a proteol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 113; no. 46; pp. 12991 - 12996
Main Authors Chen, Shuobing, Wu, Jiayi, Lu, Ying, Ma, Yong-Bei, Lee, Byung-Hoon, Yu, Zhou, Ouyang, Qi, Finley, Daniel J., Kirschner, Marc W., Mao, Youdong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 15.11.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The proteasome is the major engine of protein degradation in all eukaryotic cells. At the heart of this machine is a heterohexameric ring of AAA (ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities) proteins that unfolds ubiquitylated target proteins that are concurrently translocated into a proteolytic chamber and degraded into peptides. Using cryoelectron microscopy, we determined a near–atomic-resolution structure of the 2.5-MDa human proteasome in its ground state, as well as subnanometer-resolution structures of the holoenzyme in three alternative conformational states. The substrate-unfolding AAA-ATPase channel is narrowed by 10 inward-facing pore loops arranged into two helices that run in parallel with each other, one hydrophobic in character and the other highly charged. The gate of the core particle was unexpectedly found closed in the ground state and open in only one of the alternative states. Coordinated, stepwise conformational changes of the regulatory particle couple ATP hydrolysis to substrate translocation and regulate gating of the core particle, leading to processive degradation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Contributed by Marc W. Kirschner, September 9, 2016 (sent for review July 1, 2016; reviewed by Wah Chiu, Aaron Ciechanover, and Mark Hochstrasser)
1S.C., J.W., and Y.L. contributed equally to this work.
Author contributions: Y.L. and Y.M. designed research; S.C., J.W., Y.L., and Y.M. performed research; Y.L., B.-H.L., and Y.M. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; S.C., J.W., Y.L., Y.-B.M., Z.Y., D.J.F., and Y.M. analyzed data; and S.C., Y.L., Q.O., D.J.F., M.W.K., and Y.M. wrote the paper.
Reviewers: W.C., Baylor College of Medicine; A.C., Technion–Israel Institute of Technology; and M.H., Yale University.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1614614113