Breeding latitude predicts timing but not rate of spring migration in a widespread migratory bird in South America

• Published in: Ecology and evolution Vol. 9; no. 10; pp. 5752 - 5765
• Main Authors: Jahn, Alex E., Cereghetti, Joaquín, Cueto, Víctor R., Hallworth, Michael T., Levey, Douglas J., Marini, Miguel Â., Masson, Diego, Pizo, Marco A., Sarasola, José Hernán, Tuero, Diego T.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.05.2019; John Wiley and Sons Inc; Wiley
• Subjects: Animal behavior; Animal reproduction; Argentina; Bird migration; Birds; Brazil; Breeding; Breeding seasons; Breeding sites; cerrado; Conspecifics; Geography; life history; light‐level geolocator; Migrants; Migratory birds; Original Research; Pampas; Scholarships & fellowships; Seasonal variations; Spring; Success; South America; Brazil; Argentina; Africa; Brazil; Argentina; Pampas; cerrado; light‐level geolocator; life history
• ISSN: 2045-7758; 2045-7758
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5159

Identifying the processes that determine avian migratory strategies in different environmental contexts is imperative to understanding the constraints to survival and reproduction faced by migratory birds across the planet. We compared the spring migration strategies of Fork‐tailed Flycatchers (Tyrannus s. savana) that breed at south‐temperate latitudes (i.e., austral migrants) vs. tropical latitudes (i.e., intratropical migrants) in South America. We hypothesized that austral migrant flycatchers are more time‐selected than intratropical migrants during spring migration. As such, we predicted that austral migrants, which migrate further than intratropical migrants, will migrate at a faster rate and that the rate of migration for austral migrants will be positively correlated with the onset of spring migration. We attached light‐level geolocators to Fork‐tailed Flycatchers at two tropical breeding sites in Brazil and at two south‐temperate breeding sites in Argentina and tracked their movements until the following breeding season. Of 286 geolocators that were deployed, 37 were recovered ~1 year later, of which 28 provided useable data. Rate of spring migration did not differ significantly between the two groups, and only at one site was there a significantly positive relationship between date of initiation of spring migration and arrival date. This represents the first comparison of individual migratory strategies among conspecific passerines breeding at tropical vs. temperate latitudes and suggests that austral migrant Fork‐tailed Flycatchers in South America are not more time‐selected on spring migration than intratropical migrant conspecifics. Low sample sizes could have diminished our power to detect differences (e.g., between sexes), such that further research into the mechanisms underpinning migratory strategies in this poorly understood system is necessary. We currently lack a comprehensive understanding of the ecological processes shaping bird migration strategies at tropical and south‐temperate latitudes. We compared the spring migration behavior of Fork‐tailed Flycatchers that breed at south‐temperate latitudes (i.e., austral migrants) and at tropical latitudes (i.e., intra‐tropical migrants) in South America. Overall, we found that the two groups migrate at a similar rate in spring, but that the timing of migration between the two groups is substantially different.