Age‐Specific Functional Epigenetic Changes in p21 and p16 in Injury‐Activated Satellite Cells

The regenerative capacity of muscle dramatically decreases with age because old muscle stem cells fail to proliferate in response to tissue damage. Here, we uncover key age‐specific differences underlying this proliferative decline: namely, the genetic loci of cyclin/cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStem cells (Dayton, Ohio) Vol. 33; no. 3; pp. 951 - 961
Main Authors Li, Ju, Han, Suhyoun, Cousin, Wendy, Conboy, Irina M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Oxford University Press 01.03.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The regenerative capacity of muscle dramatically decreases with age because old muscle stem cells fail to proliferate in response to tissue damage. Here, we uncover key age‐specific differences underlying this proliferative decline: namely, the genetic loci of cyclin/cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors (CDKIs) p21 and p16 are more epigenetically silenced in young muscle stem cells, as compared to old, both in quiescent cells and those responding to tissue injury. Interestingly, phosphorylated ERK (pERK) induced in these cells by ectopic FGF2 is found in association with p21 and p16 promoters, and moreover, only in the old cells. Importantly, in the old satellite cells, FGF2/pERK silences p21 epigenetically and transcriptionally, which leads to reduced p21 protein levels and enhanced cell proliferation. In agreement with the epigenetic silencing of the loci, young muscle stem cells do not depend as much as old on ectopic FGF/pERK for their myogenic proliferation. In addition, other CDKIs, such asp15INK4B and p27KIP1, become elevated in satellite cells with age, confirming and explaining the profound regenerative defect of old muscle. This work enhances our understanding of tissue aging, promoting strategies for combating age‐imposed tissue degeneration. Stem Cells 2015;33:951–961
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1066-5099
1549-4918
DOI:10.1002/stem.1908