Effects of the herbal medicine Rikkunshito, for functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Background and Aim Functional dyspepsia (FD) is characterized by chronic and unexplained indigestion at upper abdomen. Because of unsatisfactory effect of conventional treatments, demand is growing for complementary and alternative medicine. Rikkunshito (RKT) is a herbal medicine, which has been wid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology Vol. 36; no. 1; pp. 64 - 74
Main Authors Ko, Seok‐Jae, Park, Jiseon, Kim, Min‐ji, Kim, Jinsung, Park, Jae‐Woo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Australia Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2021
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Aim Functional dyspepsia (FD) is characterized by chronic and unexplained indigestion at upper abdomen. Because of unsatisfactory effect of conventional treatments, demand is growing for complementary and alternative medicine. Rikkunshito (RKT) is a herbal medicine, which has been widely used for FD in Asia; however, the evidence is lacking. We carried out systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the effect and safety of RKT in the treatment of FD. Methods Electronic databases were searched in April 2019, including PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. All eligible studies should be randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RKT or combination therapy (RKT and western medicine) group to western medicine group. The primary outcome measure was the total clinical efficacy rate (TCE). The secondary outcomes were total dyspepsia symptom scale, gastric emptying rate, gastrin, motilin, recurrence 6 months after treatment, and Hamilton depression rating scale. Results Fifty‐two RCTs with 5475 patients were involved in this systematic review and meta‐analysis. Compared with western medicine, RKT showed significant better result, with higher TCE (relative risk = 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.25, P < 0.001). RKT presented higher reduction of total dyspepsia symptom scale, more improved gastric emptying rate, and lower recurrence 6 months after treatment compared with western medicine. However, there was no significant difference in Hamilton depression rating scale between RKT and western medicine group. Combination therapy brought significant symptom improvement with TCE compared with western medicine alone. Conclusions Rikkunshito and combination therapy might be considered an effective alternative treatment for FD. Further rigorously designed and high‐quality RCTs are needed.
Bibliography:Author contribution
The protocol was conceptualized by Seok‐Jae Ko. The study was drafted by Seok‐Jae Ko and Jae‐Woo Park. The search strategy was developed by Jiseon Park and Min‐ji Kim. Jiseon Park and Min‐ji Kim participated in screening potential studies, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias. Data synthesis and analysis were performed by Jinsung Kim. Seok‐Jae Ko was the arbiter who would intervene and resolve any disagreements, so as to make no errors in this review. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Seok‐Jae Ko and Jiseon Park are the first co‐authors to this paper.
Financial support
The authors declare there are no personal interests and conflicts of interest.
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF‐2017R1A2B4010691). The funders had no role in the design, execution, or writing of the study.
Declaration of Conflict of interest
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Financial support: This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF‐2017R1A2B4010691). The funders had no role in the design, execution, or writing of the study.
Declaration of Conflict of interest: The authors declare there are no personal interests and conflicts of interest.
Author contribution: The protocol was conceptualized by Seok‐Jae Ko. The study was drafted by Seok‐Jae Ko and Jae‐Woo Park. The search strategy was developed by Jiseon Park and Min‐ji Kim. Jiseon Park and Min‐ji Kim participated in screening potential studies, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias. Data synthesis and analysis were performed by Jinsung Kim. Seok‐Jae Ko was the arbiter who would intervene and resolve any disagreements, so as to make no errors in this review. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
ISSN:0815-9319
1440-1746
DOI:10.1111/jgh.15208