Japanese subgroup analysis of EV‐301: An open‐label, randomized phase 3 study to evaluate enfortumab vedotin versus chemotherapy in subjects with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma

Background Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody‐drug conjugate showing significant overall survival (OS) benefit versus chemotherapy for patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) in EV‐301. This subgroup analysis was conducted to further analyze...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer medicine (Malden, MA) Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 2761 - 2771
Main Authors Matsubara, Nobuaki, Yonese, Junji, Kojima, Takahiro, Azuma, Haruhito, Matsumoto, Hiroaki, Powles, Thomas, Rosenberg, Jonathan E., Petrylak, Daniel P., Matsangou, Maria, Wu, Chunzhang, Campbell, Mary, Yamashiro, Mayumi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.02.2023
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody‐drug conjugate showing significant overall survival (OS) benefit versus chemotherapy for patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) in EV‐301. This subgroup analysis was conducted to further analyze the efficacy and safety in a Japanese population. Methods In the open‐label, phase 3 EV‐301 trial, patients with la/mUC were randomized 1:1 to EV 1.25 mg/kg on Days 1, 8, and 15 for 28‐day cycles or investigator‐preselected standard chemotherapy (SC; docetaxel or paclitaxel for patients in Japan) on Day 1 of each 21‐day cycle. Primary endpoint was OS and secondary efficacy endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR). Safety/tolerability was also evaluated. Results As of the July 15, 2020 cut‐off date for the interim analysis, the Japanese subgroup included 86 patients (EV: n = 36; SC: n = 50). Median OS was 15.18 months for EV and 10.55 months for SC (HR: 0.437 [95% CI: 0.209, 0.914]). Median PFS was 6.47 months for EV and 5.39 months for SC (HR: 0.464 [95% CI: 0.258, 0.835]). Confirmed ORR was 34.4% for EV and 21.3% for SC. A higher proportion of patients receiving SC versus EV had treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs; 97.9% vs. 91.7%, respectively), including grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (75.0% vs. 63.9%). Conclusions This subgroup analysis confirmed that EV, with consistent efficacy and safety/tolerability in the EV‐301 Japanese subgroup and overall study population, represents an important treatment option for previously treated patients with la/mUC. In the global, open‐label, phase 3 EV‐301 trial, enfortumab vedotin (EV) demonstrated clinically significant overall survival (OS) benefit compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. This subgroup analysis of EV‐301 Japanese patients confirmed that EV demonstrated an OS benefit and no new safety signals identified in the Japanese subpopulation, consistent with the efficacy and safety/tolerability in the EV‐301 overall study population.
Bibliography:Takahiro Kojima, MD, was affiliated with the University of Tsukuba during the conduct of the study.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-7634
2045-7634
DOI:10.1002/cam4.5165