Effect of radiofrequency shield diameter on signal‐to‐noise ratio at ultra‐high field MRI

Purpose In this work, we investigated how the position of the radiofrequency (RF) shield can affect the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) of a receive RF coil. Our aim was to obtain physical insight for the design of a 10.5T 32‐channel head coil, subject to the constraints on the diameter of the RF shield...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMagnetic resonance in medicine Vol. 85; no. 6; pp. 3522 - 3530
Main Authors Zhang, Bei, Adriany, Gregor, Delabarre, Lance, Radder, Jerahmie, Lagore, Russell, Rutt, Brian, Yang, Qing X., Ugurbil, Kamil, Lattanzi, Riccardo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.06.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose In this work, we investigated how the position of the radiofrequency (RF) shield can affect the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) of a receive RF coil. Our aim was to obtain physical insight for the design of a 10.5T 32‐channel head coil, subject to the constraints on the diameter of the RF shield imposed by the head gradient coil geometry. Method We used full‐wave numerical simulations to investigate how the SNR of an RF receive coil depends on the diameter of the RF shield at ultra‐high magnetic field (UHF) strengths (≥7T). Results Our simulations showed that there is an SNR‐optimal RF shield size at UHF strength, whereas at low field the SNR monotonically increases with the shield diameter. For a 32‐channel head coil at 10.5T, an optimally sized RF shield could act as a cylindrical waveguide and increase the SNR in the brain by 27% compared to moving the shield as far as possible from the coil. Our results also showed that a separate transmit array between the RF shield and the receive array could considerably reduce SNR even if they are decoupled. Conclusion At sufficiently high magnetic field strength, the design of local RF coils should be optimized together with the design of the RF shield to benefit from both near field and resonant modes.
Bibliography:Funding information
National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Numbers: U01 EB025144, R01 EB024536, R01 EB021277 and P41 EB017183; National Science Foundation (NSF), Grant/Award Number: 1453675; Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas, Grant Number: RR180056
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0740-3194
1522-2594
1522-2594
DOI:10.1002/mrm.28670