Boundary-layer height and surface stability at Hyytiälä, Finland, in ERA5 and observations

• Published in: Atmospheric measurement techniques Vol. 15; no. 10; pp. 3075 - 3103
• Main Authors: Sinclair, Victoria Anne, Ritvanen, Jenna, Urbancic, Gabin, Statnaia, Irina, Batrak, Yurii, Moisseev, Dmitri, Kurppa, Mona
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Katlenburg-Lindau Copernicus GmbH 18.05.2022; Copernicus Publications
• Subjects: Aerosols; Algorithms; Boundary layer height; Climate; Climate science; Climatology; Datasets; Diurnal; Diurnal cycle; Diurnal variations; Eddy covariance; Estimates; Height; Humidity; Mathematical models; Methods; Microwave radiometers; Night; Numerical models; Radiometers; Radiosondes; Spatial variability; Spatial variations; Stability; Summer; Surface boundary layer; Surface stability; Time series; Warm seasons; Finland; Europe
• ISSN: 1867-8548; 1867-1381; 1867-8548
• DOI: 10.5194/amt-15-3075-2022

We investigate the boundary-layer (BL) height at Hyytiälä in southern Finland diagnosed from radiosonde observations, a microwave radiometer (MWR) and ERA5 reanalysis. Four different, pre-existing algorithms are used to diagnose the BL height from the radiosondes. The diagnosed BL height is sensitive to the method used. The level of agreement, and the sign of systematic bias between the four different methods, depends on the surface-layer stability. For very unstable situations, the median BL height diagnosed from the radiosondes varies from 600 to 1500 m depending on which method is applied. Good agreement between the BL height in ERA5 and diagnosed from the radiosondes using Richardson-number-based methods is found for almost all stability classes, suggesting that ERA5 has adequate vertical resolution near the surface to resolve the BL structure. However, ERA5 overestimates the BL height in very stable conditions, highlighting the ongoing challenge for numerical models to correctly resolve the stable BL. Furthermore, ERA5 BL height differs most from the radiosondes at 18:00 UTC, suggesting ERA5 does not resolve the evening transition correctly. BL height estimates from the MWR are also found to be reliable in unstable situations but often are inaccurate under stable conditions when, in comparison to ERA5 BL heights, they are much deeper. The errors in the MWR BL height estimates originate from the limitations of the manufacturer's algorithm for stable conditions and also the misidentification of the type of BL. A climatology of the annual and diurnal cycle of BL height, based on ERA5 data, and surface-layer stability, based on eddy covariance observations, was created. The shallowest (353 m) monthly median BL height occurs in February and the deepest (576 m) in June. In winter there is no diurnal cycle in BL height; unstable BLs are rare, yet so are very stable BLs. The shallowest BLs occur at night in spring and summer, and very stable conditions are most common at night in the warm season. Finally, using ERA5 gridded data, we determined that the BL height observed at Hyytiälä is representative of most land areas in southern and central Finland. However, the spatial variability of the BL height is largest during daytime in summer, reducing the area over which BL height observations from Hyytiälä would be representative.