Subsistence strategies in traditional societies distinguish gut microbiomes
Recent studies suggest that gut microbiomes of urban-industrialized societies are different from those of traditional peoples. Here we examine the relationship between lifeways and gut microbiota through taxonomic and functional potential characterization of faecal samples from hunter-gatherer and t...
Saved in:
Published in | Nature communications Vol. 6; no. 1; p. 6505 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
25.03.2015
Nature Publishing Group Nature Pub. Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Recent studies suggest that gut microbiomes of urban-industrialized societies are different from those of traditional peoples. Here we examine the relationship between lifeways and gut microbiota through taxonomic and functional potential characterization of faecal samples from hunter-gatherer and traditional agriculturalist communities in Peru and an urban-industrialized community from the US. We find that in addition to taxonomic and metabolic differences between urban and traditional lifestyles, hunter-gatherers form a distinct sub-group among traditional peoples. As observed in previous studies, we find that
Treponema
are characteristic of traditional gut microbiomes. Moreover, through genome reconstruction (2.2–2.5 MB, coverage depth × 26–513) and functional potential characterization, we discover these
Treponema
are diverse, fall outside of pathogenic clades and are similar to
Treponema succinifaciens
, a known carbohydrate metabolizer in swine. Gut
Treponema
are found in non-human primates and all traditional peoples studied to date, suggesting they are symbionts lost in urban-industrialized societies.
The gut microbiomes of urban-industrialized societies differ from those of traditional rural societies and hunter-gatherers. Here the authors perform a comparative analysis of available and new gut microbiome data to provide fresh insight into these differences. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 These authors contributed equally to this work |
ISSN: | 2041-1723 2041-1723 |
DOI: | 10.1038/ncomms7505 |