High-flow Nasal Cannulae Versus Non-invasive Ventilation for Preoxygenation of Obese Patients: The PREOPTIPOP Randomized Trial

In obese patients, preoxygenation with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was reported to improve outcomes compared with facemask. In this setting, high-flow nasal cannulae (HFNC) used before and during intubation has never been studied against NIV. The PREOPTIPOP study is a randomised, single-centre, o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEClinicalMedicine Vol. 13; pp. 112 - 119
Main Authors Vourc'h, Mickael, Baud, Gabrielle, Feuillet, Fanny, Blanchard, Claire, Mirallie, Eric, Guitton, Christophe, Jaber, Samir, Asehnoune, Karim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier 01.08.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In obese patients, preoxygenation with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was reported to improve outcomes compared with facemask. In this setting, high-flow nasal cannulae (HFNC) used before and during intubation has never been studied against NIV. The PREOPTIPOP study is a randomised, single-centre, open-labelled, controlled trial including obese patients requiring intubation before scheduled surgery. Patients were randomised to receive preoxygenation by HFNC or NIV. HFNC was maintained throughout intubation whereas NIV was removed when apnea occurred to perform laryngoscopy. The study was designed to assess the superiority of HNFC. The primary outcome was the lowest level of end-tidal oxygen concentration (EtO ) within 2 min after intubation. Secondary outcomes included drop in pulse oximetry and complications related to intubation. A total of 100 patients were randomised. The intent-to-treat analysis found median [IQR] lowest EtO of 76% [66-82] for HFNC and 88% [82-90] for NIV (mean difference - 12·1 [- 15·1 to - 8·5], p < 0·0001). Mild desaturation below 95% was more frequent with HFNC (30%) than with NIV (12%) (relative risk 2·5, IC 95% [1·1 to 5·9], p = 0·03) and median lowest SpO during intubation was 98% [93-99] in HFNC vs. 99% [97-100] in NIV (p = 0·03). Severe and moderate complications were not different but patients reported more discomfort with NIV (28%) vs. HFNC (4%), p = 0·001. Compared with NIV, preoxygenation with HFNC in obese patients provided lower EtO after intubation and a higher rate of desaturation < 95%. Institutional funding, additional grant from Fisher & Paykel. April 10, 2017. Preoxygenation Optimization in Obese Patients: High-flow Nasal Cannulae Oxygen Versus Non-invasive Ventilation: A Single-centre Randomised Controlled Study. The PREOPTIPOP Study. NCT03106441 2017-A00305-48. CPP Nord-Ouest I, registration number 019/2017. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03106441.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2589-5370
2589-5370
DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.05.014