Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for sporadic pheochromocytoma

Background Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma remains subject of debate, owing to the systemic consequences of pneumoperitoneum in patients with catecholamine-secreting tumors. Methods A prospective randomized study was conducted (2000–2006), evaluating cardiovascular instability during...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSurgical endoscopy Vol. 22; no. 6; pp. 1435 - 1439
Main Authors Tiberio, Guido A. M., Baiocchi, Gian Luca, Arru, Luca, Agabiti Rosei, Claudia, De Ponti, Simona, Matheis, Albert, Rizzoni, Damiano, Giulini, Stefano M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Springer-Verlag 01.06.2008
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma remains subject of debate, owing to the systemic consequences of pneumoperitoneum in patients with catecholamine-secreting tumors. Methods A prospective randomized study was conducted (2000–2006), evaluating cardiovascular instability during open ( n  = 9, group A) or laparoscopic ( n  = 13, group B) adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. Haemodynamic parameters were recorded by invasive monitoring. Results Haemodynamic instability was observed in 3/9 (group A) and 6/13 patients (group B), with a mean of 1.8 and 2.2 hypertensive peaks per patient ( p  = n.s.). Blood loss (164 ± 94 cc versus 48 ± 36 cc, p  < 0.05) and operative time (180 ± 40 versus 158 ± 45 min, p  = n.s.) favored laparoscopic procedures. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were nil. Hospital stay was shorter in group B ( p  < 0.05). Long-term follow-up was always normal. Conclusions Laparoscopic approach for pheochromocytoma can be as safe as open surgery; intraoperative haemodynamic instability, although usually controlled with success, remains a source of concern.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-008-9904-1