Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach

Describes the development and testing of a structured methodology for the design of performance measurement systems. Frameworks, such as the balanced scorecard and the performance prism, have been proposed, but until recently little attention has been devoted to the question of how these frameworks...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of operations & production management Vol. 20; no. 10; pp. 1119 - 1145
Main Authors Neely, Andy, Mills, John, Platts, Ken, Richards, Huw, Gregory, Mike, Bourne, Mike, Kennerley, Mike
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bradford MCB UP Ltd 01.10.2000
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Describes the development and testing of a structured methodology for the design of performance measurement systems. Frameworks, such as the balanced scorecard and the performance prism, have been proposed, but until recently little attention has been devoted to the question of how these frameworks can be populated, i.e. how managers can decide specifically which measures to adopt. Following a wide ranging review of the performance measurement literature, a framework identifying the desirable characteristics of a performance measurement system design process is developed. This framework provided guidelines which were subsequently used to inform the development of a process-based approach to performance measurement system design. The process was enhanced and refined during application in three action research projects, involving major UK automotive and aerospace companies. The revised process was then formally documented and tested through six further industrial applications. Finally the process was written up in the form of a workbook and made publicly available.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0144-3577
1758-6593
DOI:10.1108/01443570010343708