Utility of body mass index, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio as screening tools for hyperglycemia in young people

To evaluate the ability of BMI, WC and WHtR to discriminate hyperglycemia in young people, and to determine whether there is an increase in the accuracy with the addition of WC and/or WHtR to BMI. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1,139 schoolchildren aged 6 to 17 years from Northeastern Braz...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of Endocrinology and Metabolism Vol. 60; no. 6; pp. 526 - 531
Main Authors Quadros, Teresa Maria Bianchini de, Gordia, Alex Pinheiro, Mota, Jorge, Silva, Luciana Rodrigues
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Brazil Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia 01.11.2016
Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To evaluate the ability of BMI, WC and WHtR to discriminate hyperglycemia in young people, and to determine whether there is an increase in the accuracy with the addition of WC and/or WHtR to BMI. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1,139 schoolchildren aged 6 to 17 years from Northeastern Brazil. Body weight, height, WC and fasting glucose levels were measured, and the BMI and WHtR were calculated. The presence of hyperglycemia was defined as a fasting glucose level ≥ 100 mg/dL. The prevalence of hyperglycemia was 6.6%. Strong correlations were observed between the anthropometric indicators studied (BMI vs. WC = 0.87; BMI vs. WHtR = 0.87; WC vs. WHtR = 0.90). Hyperglycemia was more likely to be present in young people with excess weight (PR = 1.70), high WC (PR = 1.85), and high WHtR (PR = 1.91). The accuracies to discriminate hyperglycemia were significant, but low, for the individual (BMI = 0.56; WC = 0.53; WHtR = 0.55) and combined indicators (BMI + WC = 0.55; BMI + WHtR = 0.55). Our findings do not support the use of BMI, WC or WHtR as screening tools for hyperglycemia in children and adolescents.
Bibliography:Disclosure: no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Author contribution: TMBQ, and APG designed the study, directed implementation and data collection, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. LRS, and JM edited the manuscript for intellectual content and provided critical comments on the manuscript.
ISSN:2359-3997
2359-4292
2359-3997
2359-4292
DOI:10.1590/2359-3997000000226