Attention-Based Temporal-Frequency Aggregation for Speaker Verification

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have significantly promoted the development of speaker verification (SV) systems because of their powerful deep feature learning capability. In CNN-based SV systems, utterance-level aggregation is an important component, and it compresses the frame-level features...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 22; no. 6; p. 2147
Main Authors Wang, Meng, Feng, Dazheng, Su, Tingting, Chen, Mohan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland MDPI AG 10.03.2022
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have significantly promoted the development of speaker verification (SV) systems because of their powerful deep feature learning capability. In CNN-based SV systems, utterance-level aggregation is an important component, and it compresses the frame-level features generated by the CNN frontend into an utterance-level representation. However, most of the existing aggregation methods aggregate the extracted features across time and cannot capture the speaker-dependent information contained in the frequency domain. To handle this problem, this paper proposes a novel attention-based frequency aggregation method, which focuses on the key frequency bands that provide more information for utterance-level representation. Meanwhile, two more effective temporal-frequency aggregation methods are proposed in combination with the existing temporal aggregation methods. The two proposed methods can capture the speaker-dependent information contained in both the time domain and frequency domain of frame-level features, thus improving the discriminability of speaker embedding. Besides, a powerful CNN-based SV system is developed and evaluated on the TIMIT and Voxceleb datasets. The experimental results indicate that the CNN-based SV system using the temporal-frequency aggregation method achieves a superior equal error rate of 5.96% on Voxceleb compared with the state-of-the-art baseline models.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1424-8220
1424-8220
DOI:10.3390/s22062147