Patient–ventilator asynchrony during non-invasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure: a multicenter study

• Published in: Intensive care medicine Vol. 35; no. 5; pp. 840 - 846
• Main Authors: Vignaux, Laurence, Vargas, Frédéric, Roeseler, Jean, Tassaux, Didier, Thille, Arnaud W., Kossowsky, Michel P., Brochard, Laurent, Jolliet, Philippe
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01.05.2009; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Acute Disease; Aged; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy; Anesthesiology; Biological and medical sciences; Body Mass Index; Critical Care Medicine; Electromyography; Emergency and intensive respiratory care; Emergency Medicine; Female; Humans; Intensive; Intensive care; Intensive care medicine; Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data; Male; Medical sciences; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original; Pain Medicine; Patients; Patients - statistics & numerical data; Pediatrics; Pneumology/Respiratory System; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Respiration, Artificial - statistics & numerical data; Respiratory failure; Respiratory Insufficiency - rehabilitation; Respiratory Muscles - innervation; Ventilators; France; Switzerland; Noninvasive ventilation; Asynchrony; Patient–ventilator interaction; Mechanical ventilation; Human; Ventilator; Intensive care; Patient-ventilator interaction; Multicenter study; Acute respiratory insufficiency; Resuscitation
• ISSN: 0342-4642; 1432-1238
• DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1416-5

Objective To determine the prevalence of patient–ventilator asynchrony in patients receiving non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for acute respiratory failure. Design Prospective multicenter observation study. Setting Intensive care units in three university hospitals. Methods Patients consecutively admitted to ICU were included. NIV, performed with an ICU ventilator, was set by the clinician. Airway pressure, flow, and surface diaphragmatic electromyography were recorded continuously for 30 min. Asynchrony events and the asynchrony index (AI) were determined from visual inspection of the recordings and clinical observation. Results A total of 60 patients were included, 55% of whom were hypercapnic. Auto-triggering was present in 8 (13%) patients, double triggering in 9 (15%), ineffective breaths in 8 (13%), premature cycling 7 (12%) and late cycling in 14 (23%). An AI > 10%, indicating severe asynchrony, was present in 26 patients (43%), whose median (25–75 IQR) AI was 26 (15–54%). A significant correlation was found between the magnitude of leaks and the number of ineffective breaths and severity of delayed cycling. Multivariate analysis indicated that the level of pressure support and the magnitude of leaks were weakly, albeit significantly, associated with an AI > 10%. Patient comfort scale was higher in pts with an AI < 10%. Conclusion Patient–ventilator asynchrony is common in patients receiving NIV for acute respiratory failure. Our results suggest that leaks play a major role in generating patient–ventilator asynchrony and discomfort, and point the way to further research to determine if ventilator functions designed to cope with leaks can reduce asynchrony in the clinical setting.