Camera Arrangement Optimization for Workspace Monitoring in Human–Robot Collaboration

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 23; no. 1; p. 295
• Main Authors: Oščádal, Petr, Kot, Tomáš, Spurný, Tomáš, Suder, Jiří, Vocetka, Michal, Dobeš, Libor, Bobovský, Zdenko
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 27.12.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Algorithms; camera; Cameras; Classification; Collaboration; Energy consumption; Force and energy; Humans; human–robot interaction; Robotics; Robotics - methods; Robots; Sensors; sensors network; workspace monitoring; United States; New Jersey; sensors network; camera; collaboration; human–robot interaction; workspace monitoring
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s23010295

Human–robot interaction is becoming an integral part of practice. There is a greater emphasis on safety in workplaces where a robot may bump into a worker. In practice, there are solutions that control the robot based on the potential energy in a collision or a robot re-planning the straight-line trajectory. However, a sensor system must be designed to detect obstacles across the human–robot shared workspace. So far, there is no procedure that engineers can follow in practice to deploy sensors ideally. We come up with the idea of classifying the space as an importance index, which determines what part of the workspace sensors should sense to ensure ideal obstacle sensing. Then, the ideal camera positions can be automatically found according to this classified map. Based on the experiment, the coverage of the important volume by the calculated camera position in the workspace was found to be on average 37% greater compared to a camera placed intuitively by test subjects. Using two cameras at the workplace, the calculated positions were 27% more effective than the subjects’ camera positions. Furthermore, for three cameras, the calculated positions were 13% better than the subjects’ camera positions, with a total coverage of more than 99% of the classified map.