Evolution of dispersal in open advective environments

• Published in: Journal of mathematical biology Vol. 69; no. 6-7; pp. 1319 - 1342
• Main Authors: Lou, Yuan, Lutscher, Frithjof
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.12.2014; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Applications of Mathematics; Biological Evolution; Ecosystem; Mathematical and Computational Biology; Mathematics; Mathematics and Statistics; Models, Theoretical; Population Dynamics; Persistence; 92D25; Evolution of dispersal; Reaction–diffusion–advection; 35K57; Advective environments; Invasion analysis
• ISSN: 0303-6812; 1432-1416; 1432-1416
• DOI: 10.1007/s00285-013-0730-2

We consider a two-species competition model in a one-dimensional advective environment, where individuals are exposed to unidirectional flow. The two species follow the same population dynamics but have different random dispersal rates and are subject to a net loss of individuals from the habitat at the downstream end. In the case of non-advective environments, it is well known that lower diffusion rates are favored by selection in spatially varying but temporally constant environments, with or without net loss at the boundary. We consider several different biological scenarios that give rise to different boundary conditions, in particular hostile and “free-flow” conditions. We establish the existence of a critical advection speed for the persistence of a single species. We derive a formula for the invasion exponent and perform a linear stability analysis of the semi-trivial steady state under free-flow boundary conditions for constant and linear growth rate. For homogeneous advective environments with free-flow boundary conditions, we show that populations with higher dispersal rate will always displace populations with slower dispersal rate. In contrast, our analysis of a spatially implicit model suggest that for hostile boundary conditions, there is a unique dispersal rate that is evolutionarily stable. Nevertheless, both scenarios show that unidirectional flow can put slow dispersers at a disadvantage and higher dispersal rate can evolve.