Two-Drug Regimens for HIV-Current Evidence, Research Gaps and Future Challenges
During the last 30 years, antiretroviral treatment (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been continuously evolving. Since 1996, three-drug regimens (3DR) have been standard-of-care for HIV treatment and are based on a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcri...
Saved in:
Published in | Microorganisms (Basel) Vol. 10; no. 2; p. 433 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Switzerland
MDPI AG
14.02.2022
MDPI |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | During the last 30 years, antiretroviral treatment (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has been continuously evolving. Since 1996, three-drug regimens (3DR) have been standard-of-care for HIV treatment and are based on a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The effectiveness of first-generation 3DRs allowed a dramatic increase in the life expectancy of HIV-infected patients, although it was associated with several side effects and ART-related toxicities. The development of novel two-drug regimens (2DRs) started in the mid-2000s in order to minimize side effects, reduce drug-drug interactions and improve treatment compliance. Several clinical trials compared 2DRs and 3DRs in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients and showed the non-inferiority of 2DRs in terms of efficacy, which led to 2DRs being used as first-line treatment in several clinical scenarios, according to HIV clinical guidelines. In this review, we summarize the current evidence, research gaps and future prospects of 2DRs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2076-2607 2076-2607 |
DOI: | 10.3390/microorganisms10020433 |